A farmer had lived on the same farm all his life. He’d been born and raised there and had received the farm as an inheritance when his parents had died. It was a good farm, but the farmer had begun to think that maybe he’d like to stretch his wings a bit and try living somewhere new. This prompted him to contact a real estate agent and request that the agent come out to the farm and meet with him.
The agent came and said, “So, you’re thinking about selling your farm?” The farmer answered, “Yep, I used to love living here, but lately I’ve started wondering what I’m missing out on somewhere else.” The agent said, “I understand. Let’s go into the kitchen and sit down at the table. You can tell me all about the place and I’ll write up a description to run as an advertisement.”
As the two men sat there at the kitchen table, the farmer began his description. “This farm has 100 acres,” he said. “The soil will grow just about anything — corn, potatoes, beans, or whatever else I think I can sell. The barn is in good shape. It’s got a fresh coat of paint from last year and the roof was replaced about three years ago. There’s a John Deere tractor sitting in there that goes with the place. I bought that tractor nine or ten years ago but it still runs like new. There’s some livestock that go with the sale, too. I’ve got about twenty head of cattle, three good horses, and a milk cow.”
The farmer continued. “This farm house is about 2,200 square feet. Upstairs, it’s got three bedrooms and a bathroom, and there’s another bedroom and bathroom downstairs. I had to buy a new cooking stove about five years ago and a new refrigerator about a year ago. The furnace doesn’t give me any problems at all. The roof is solid, and I’ve got a well out back that holds up during the worst droughts. Oh, and about water, did I mention that there is a creek that runs along the southern boundary of the farm? That creek is full of trout. I take a day off every now and then, catch myself a mess of fish, and have a big ole’ fish fry.”
As the farmer relayed all this information, the real estate agent wrote furiously. Finally, the agent said, “Okay, here’s a rough draft of what I’ll run” and then read what he had written. As the farmer sat there listening the agent could tell by the man’s facial expression that the advertisement was having an effect. The agent thought, “I’m going to make a nice commission on this place.” But once he finished, he learned just what effect the advertisement was having. The farmer said, “Hold everything! I’ve changed my mind about selling. I’ve been dreaming about a place like this all my life!”
The Bible is filled with stories in which God’s people move to new locations. Sometimes those moves are the consequences of sin. Under this category, we can file the stories of Adam and Eve being forced to leave Eden and the people of Judah being deported to Babylon.
Other times, however, the moves are simply the result of God’s will being done. Under this category, we can file the stories of Abraham moving from Ur to Canaan and Philip moving his ministry from Samaria to Gaza. Both of those moves were accomplished because God commanded them.
And then there are the moves that are nothing less than examples of God providing deliverance for His people. Think about Israel’s great exodus out of Egypt, for example. Also, there is Ruth being delivered from a life of obscurity in Moab to one of prominence as Boaz’s wife in Bethlehem
My point is that God’s will must be discerned regarding each potential move. It isn’t always His will to stay, but it isn’t always His will to move. Sometimes He says, “Go,” and other times He says, “Stay.” That’s why I’m typically hesitant about advising anyone in such matters. I have a hard enough time figuring out when I’m supposed to stay and when I’m supposed to go!
What I can tell you is that Proverbs 3:5-6 has always been a help to me anytime I’ve stood at the crossroad of decision. And so, I’ll offer these verses as the close to this post. I trust that they will be as much of a blessing to you as they have been to me in decisions past:
Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding: In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths. (N.K.J.V.)

Choosing the East Side of the Jordan
Numbers chapter 32 provides us with a fascinating twist in the history of Moses and the Israelites. The twist involves the tribes of Reuben and Gad as well as half the tribe of Manasseh, and it holds multiple metaphorical lessons for us in regards to the spiritual life. That’s why every Christian should understand the story.
As the story opens, Moses and the Israelites are in the final stages of their forty years of wandering in the wilderness regions surrounding the land of Canaan. Those forty years had been God’s judgment upon the people for being too unbelieving and cowardly to cross over the Jordan river, go to war with the inhabitants of Canaan, and take the land forty years earlier (Numbers chapters 13 and 14). But now a new generation of Israelites was preparing to right the wrong of that previous generation.
God had already decreed that Moses himself would not be the one to lead the nation in its conquest of Canaan. A certain sin that Moses had recently committed at Kadesh had cost him that opportunity (Numbers 20:1-13). Joshua (Moses’ right-hand man, successor, and military General) would be the one to lead Israel in the conquering of Canaan. In the run-up to that full-scale invasion, certain territories on the eastern side of the Jordan river had already been conquered (Numbers chapters 21 through 31).
That set the stage for the events of Numbers chapter 32. As part of those recent victories, the Israelites had conquered the land of Jazer and the land of Gilead. Basically, this was all the territory between the Arnon river and the Yarmuk river (Joshua 12:1-6). What made those lands particularly appealing was the fact that they were perfect for raising livestock. This appeal hadn’t gone unnoticed by the Israelite tribes of Reuben and Gad, both of which owned large herds of livestock, most of which were the spoils of a recent plundering of the Midianites (Numbers chapter 31). The appeal of the lands caused the leaders of the two tribes to think, “No matter what the other side of the Jordan river holds for us, it can’t be better than what we have right here.”
So, the leaders of the two tribes went to Moses and asked if he would give them the lands as their inheritance and allow them to settle there (32:1-5). They even said, “Do not take us over the Jordan (v.5, N.K.J.V.) But Moses’ response, not unpredictably, was one of fury. He accused the two tribes of being cowards who wanted to remain in safety while their fellow tribes went to war in Canaan (32:6-7). He also told them they were acting like their ancestors had acted forty years earlier in refusing to take Canaan (32:8-14) and called them “a brood of sinful men” (32:14).
It was at this point that the leaders of the two tribes explained to Moses that they had no intention of not taking part in the fighting to settle Canaan. Was their response a “plan B” explanation they devised on the spot when they realized how appalled Moses was at their request? Perhaps. At any rate, their proposed plan began with them first preparing their requested lands by building pens for their livestock and cities for their women and children (32:16-17). Once those projects were completed, the fighting men from the two tribes would then take their place in Israel’s army, cross over the Jordan with the rest of Israel, and continue the warfare until Canaan was completely conquered (32:18). They would even take point by going “before” the children of Israel (32:17). Only when the land was conquered would they return to their families and herds by crossing back over the Jordan river (32:19).
After hearing this explanation Moses agreed to the request, but he warned them that they had better live up to their part of the deal (32:20-24). If they didn’t God would judge them harshly. Since Moses already knew that he wouldn’t be around to ensure that everything got handled correctly, he called in Eleazar the priest, Joshua, and the heads of all the tribes and explained the agreement to them (32:28-32). At some point, half the tribe of Manasseh got in on the deal as well because they also had livestock and liked the looks of the lands (32:39-42). A full listing of the lands and the cities that ultimately either got built, rebuilt, or conquered on the “safe” side of the Jordan river is provided in Numbers 32:33-42.
In the end, the fighting men from Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh did make good on their agreement with Moses, and they did return to their lands and settle there. Joshua 13:15-33 tells us that the tribe of Reuben settled in the southern portion of the lands, the tribe of Gad settled in the northern portions, and half the tribe of Manasseh settled furthest north in Bashan. (According to Joshua 13:1-7, the other half of the tribe of Manasseh settled in its allotted portion of Canaan.)
All this brings us to the question: “When all the dust was settled from the centuries that would follow, was the decision of the two and a half tribes to settle on the east side of the Jordan river a good one?” The answer to that is, no. Consider the results of the decision:
So, what spiritual lessons can we Christians learn from this story? Well, here are a few, and I offer them as the close to this post. Consider each one carefully and take heed that you don’t fall victim to it: